African Studies Global Virtual Forum: Decoloniality & Southern Epistemologies - Emad Abdul-latif

African Studies Global Virtual Forum: Decoloniality & Southern Epistemologies - Emad Abdul-latif

🎙 Emad Abdul-latif 👥 656 📅 September 21, 2026 ⏱ 90 min 👁 0 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-09-21
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Khitabatcritical discourse analysisArab worldsystemic functional grammardecoloniality

Summary

This video is a virtual forum presentation by Dr. Emad Abdul-latif, where he introduces Khitabat, a biannual open-access journal focused on discourse studies of the Arab world. He explains that the journal aims to encourage critical research on understudied public discourses, particularly political, religious, and social ones, and emphasizes the importance of culturally adapted methodologies. He discusses the journal’s history, its special issues, and its commitment to supporting Arab researchers. Throughout the session, he engages in dialogue with Professor Sinfree Makoni and audience questions, addressing topics such as the geographical scope of the Arab world, the definition of Arab issues, and the methodological challenges of applying Western frameworks to Arabic. He argues that Arabic language features and socio-political contexts require radical methodological adaptations. The discussion also touches on race, colorism, and censorship in the Arab academic environment. The presentation highlights the need to decolonize academic knowledge production and to create platforms for alternative epistemologies.

154 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The value of this content lies in its concrete presentation of a decolonial academic initiative. The speaker provides detailed arguments on why methodologies like systemic functional grammar must be rethought for Arabic, citing specific linguistic features and political contexts. He challenges the assumption that global research agendas are universally applicable, offering a clear rationale based on the distinct socio-political conditions of the Arab world. The argumentation is coherent and grounded in his experience as an editor and scholar, though it relies more on illustrative examples than systematic evidence.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The speaker is a professor with multiple publications, lending some authority. However, he does not cite specific studies or provide verifiable references during the talk; he references some of his own works and generic concepts like ‘Oxford Handbook on Discourse Analysis’ without precise details. The title is appropriate as the session is indeed about decoloniality and southern epistemologies, with the journal serving as a concrete example. The discussion is rigorous in its critical questioning, but the lack of explicit citations limits its scientific strength.

187 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the session's focus on decoloniality and southern epistemologies, as the discussion centers on the journal Khitabat and its decolonial mission.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The speaker is a professor of rhetoric and discourse analysis with several publications, and the discussion provides reasoned arguments about decolonial approaches. However, the talk is largely descriptive and relies on personal perspectives rather than empirical data, limiting the level of scientific certainty.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The presentation offers a concrete example of a decolonial academic project through the journal Khitabat, emphasizing the need for culturally specific methodologies in discourse analysis. It also highlights the understudied nature of Arab public discourses and the challenges faced by researchers. The discussion contributes to the broader conversation on decolonizing knowledge production in the humanities.

Pour aller plus loin :

100 words

Radar Profile

The radar shows balanced but moderate scores across information quantity, quality, technical level, and reliability. The session is rich in descriptive content but lacks empirical validation and concrete citations, leading to a profile that is informative yet not fully rigorous.

Reliability 7/10