J’ai testé le Oppo Find X9 Ultra : Samsung et Apple sont largués !

J’ai testé le Oppo Find X9 Ultra : Samsung et Apple sont largués !

I tested the Oppo Find X9 Ultra: Samsung and Apple are left behind!

🎙 Frandroid 👥 625K 📅 April 22, 2026 ⏱ 10 min 👁 71K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-10-20
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Oppo Find X9 Ultrasmartphone photographyXiaomi 17 Ultrabatteryhigh-end smartphone

Summary

This video is a hands-on review of the Oppo Find X9 Ultra, a flagship smartphone launched in France for the first time. The presenter focuses on photography, comparing it with the Xiaomi 17 Ultra across several scenarios. While the Xiaomi often wins on color balance and portrait sharpness, the Oppo excels in 10x optical zoom and night shots. The design is massive and inspired by Hasselblad cameras, with a large 7050 mAh battery offering excellent autonomy and 100W fast charging. The software is customizable, and the device features a Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, IP68/IP69 certification, and Wi-Fi 7. The reviewer concludes that both phones are excellent and that Chinese brands are pushing innovation harder than Samsung, Apple, or Google. The price is 1699€, which many viewers find excessive.

129 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The review provides valuable hands-on comparisons, especially in photography, with detailed side-by-side examples. The argumentation is structured and based on direct observation, strengthening its credibility. However, the conclusion that Samsung and Apple are ’left behind’ is not directly supported by the evidence, as the comparison is limited to Xiaomi, and the reviewer admits both devices are closely matched. The subjective nature of photo preferences is acknowledged, but the title overstates the findings. The inclusion of battery tests and autonomy measurements adds quantitative value.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is from Frandroid, a well-known tech outlet, and declares non-sponsorship. It links to its own written test and product page, but no independent external sources are cited. The review notes that the software is a preview, which affects reliability. The title is somewhat sensationalist and not fully aligned with the balanced content. The comparison methodology is clear, though limited to one competitor. Public comments (30 analyzed) show appreciation for the detail but widespread criticism of the high price and requests for comparisons with other flagships like the Vivo X300 Ultra.

190 words

Title / Content Match

The title suggests a clear superiority over Samsung and Apple, but the video focuses on comparison with Xiaomi and admits both are excellent, making the title somewhat overstated.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The review is based on hands-on testing and comparisons with a rival device, with clear criteria. The reviewer acknowledges limitations (e.g., software preview). No sponsorship is declared. However, it remains a subjective opinion on a single unit.

Chapters

Cited Sources

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers an early hands-on evaluation of a new flagship, emphasizing its camera capabilities and battery life, and directly compares it with a key rival. Its original contribution lies in the visual and comparative analysis, helping viewers understand real-world performance. The review also highlights the broader trend of Chinese smartphone brands’ rapid innovation.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Computational photography — To understand the image processing techniques shaping smartphone photo quality.
  • Periscope lens — Relevant to the telephoto zoom implementation.
  • Hasselblad partnership — The design cues and color science discussed in the review, without a specific URL.

98 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows strong scores in information quantity and quality, but moderate technical depth and reliability. This indicates a well-rounded but not deeply technical review, with a slight gap in scientific rigor due to reliance on subjective opinion.

Reliability 7/10

💬 Balanced: viewers appreciate the detailed review but many express concern about the high price (1699€) and call for comparisons with other flagships.