On a essayé la TESLA la MOINS CHÈRE à 35 790 € et c'est vraiment bien ! (Essai Model Y Standard)

On a essayé la TESLA la MOINS CHÈRE à 35 790 € et c'est vraiment bien ! (Essai Model Y Standard)

We tried the CHEAPEST TESLA at €35,790 and it's really good! (Model Y Standard Test)

by Frandroid · View the channel on PSI

Applied Sciences & Engineering Hobbies & Practical WLifestyle, Hobbies and LeisureWGCBMotor cars: general interest
🎙 Frandroid 👥 625K 📅 November 10, 2025 ⏱ 32 min 👁 39K 📄 documentary 🧭 2026-10-20
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Tesla Model Y Standardelectric car reviewGigafactory Berlincost-cutting featuresEV comparison

Summary

This video presents an exclusive test of the new Tesla Model Y Standard, the entry-level version of the popular SUV, tested at the Berlin Gigafactory. The review highlights more than 20 differences compared to the premium versions, including a simplified exterior design with conventional LED headlights instead of the light bar, and a redesigned rear without the full-width LED strip. Inside, key cost reductions include fabric upholstery, a floating center console without a closed storage compartment, manual steering wheel adjustment, and removal of the ambient LED strip and HEPA filter. The seats lose some electric adjustments and rear heated seats, and the panoramic glass roof is replaced by an opaque fabric headliner. However, the car retains its impressive 800L trunk, the large infotainment screen with over-the-air updates, and the extensive Supercharger network integration. Driving impressions are positive: steering and braking are praised, but power is reduced to 200 hp (0-100 km/h in 7.2s) and noise isolation is less effective due to the absence of double-glazed windows. The suspension is simpler (passive), yet the 18-inch wheels mitigate comfort issues and help achieve a low WLTP consumption of 13.1 kWh/100km. Priced at €35,790 with the eco-bonus, the Model Y Standard is positioned as a strong competitor in the EV market, although some missing features may disappoint buyers.

215 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The review provides substantial value by detailing the specific differences of the entry-level Model Y, which is rarely covered in such depth. The presenter thoroughly explains the rationale behind each cost-cutting choice and assesses their real-world impact. The argumentation is well-structured, moving from exterior to interior, driving, charging, and pricing, with clear comparisons to the premium versions and other EVs. However, the discussion is largely qualitative, with few objective measurements (except WLTP consumption and 0-100 km/h time), and some claims (e.g., ‘one of the least consuming EVs in the world’) are based on manufacturer data rather than independent testing. The presenter’s enthusiasm for Tesla’s software ecosystem is apparent, but he also acknowledges drawbacks, providing a balanced perspective.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video is rigorous in its approach, using a clear methodology of comparative testing. The main external source is the accompanying written article on Frandroid, which provides more detailed data. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video includes a transparent disclosure that it is not sponsored. The presenter’s expertise is evident, and he distinguishes between objective facts and personal preferences. The main weakness is the lack of third-party verification of some performance claims, and the reliance on a single test vehicle (pre-production). The title does not exaggerate, and the content matches the promise of evaluating the cheapest Tesla. Overall, the scientific credibility is good for a consumer technology review.

243 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a detailed test of the cheapest Tesla Model Y, highlighting its value for money while noting numerous cost-cutting measures.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The review is based on exclusive access to the vehicle and covers a comprehensive range of aspects (design, interior, driving, charging, price). However, subjective impressions prevail over quantitative measurements, and some statements (e.g., about consumption) rely on manufacturer claims.

Chapters

Cited Sources

External References

Contribution & Novelties

This review offers a hands-on assessment of the Tesla Model Y Standard, a version that has received little media attention due to its recent launch. It systematically lists over 20 differences with the premium models, providing a practical checklist for potential buyers. The insight into the impact of removing the panoramic roof and double-glazing on comfort is valuable for consumers comparing EVs. The video also clarifies the trade-offs between lower power and efficiency, making it a useful reference for those seeking a balance between cost and performance.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • Tesla Model Y — Overview of the Model Y model line, including technical specifications and versions.
  • Lithium iron phosphate battery — Explanation of LFP battery chemistry, which may be used in this variant, impacting cost and range.
  • Tesla Supercharger — Details on the fast-charging network that is a key advantage for Tesla owners in Europe.

147 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows high scores in quantity and general reliability, reflecting the comprehensive and well-documented nature of the review. The quality and technical level are moderately high, indicating a solid but not deeply technical analysis. The global score aligns with the positive but critical assessment of the vehicle.

Reliability 8/10

💬 On the basis of the 30 comments analyzed, the overall sentiment is balanced: many viewers appreciate the detailed review and acknowledge the car's value for money, while others criticize the removal of features and the duplication of the video across two channels.