NoLimitSecu #551 - Sécurité des ERP

NoLimitSecu #551 - Sécurité des ERP

NoLimitSecu #551 - ERP Security

🎙 NoLimitSecu 👥 2K 📅 September 28, 2026 ⏱ 35 min 👁 8 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-09-28
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

SAPERPsecurityABAPpenetration testing

Summary

This episode of NoLimitSecu discusses ERP security, specifically focusing on SAP. The guest, Wael Feguiri, an offensive security engineer at KPMG, explains what SAP is, its importance in enterprise environments, and the evolution of its security posture. Historically, SAP was considered a black box and rarely attacked, but recent zero-day exploits and increased attacker interest have changed this perception. The discussion covers SAP’s proprietary architecture, including the ABAP platform, basis components, RFC protocol, and its analogue to Active Directory. Mr. Feguiri outlines a three-tier audit methodology: architecture and configuration review, penetration testing with assumed breach scenarios, and source code review. He also mentions his own open-source tool, SAExec, inspired by NetExec, and other existing tools like pysap and sncscan. The role of LLMs in assisting reverse engineering and vulnerability discovery is touched upon, as well as the shared responsibility model in cloud deployments like SAP S/4HANA and BTP. The episode concludes with advice for pentesters to consider specializing in SAP security, given the growing demand and limited expertise.

168 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video provides substantial value by demystifying SAP security for a technical audience. It covers a broad range of topics including architecture, attack vectors, auditing practices, and available tools, all presented from a practitioner’s perspective. The argumentation is coherent, drawing analogies between SAP and Active Directory to make complex concepts accessible. The speaker supports his claims with references to specific CVEs and recent security incidents (e.g., the zero-day exploited in 2025), which strengthens the credibility of his arguments. However, the discussion is primarily conversational rather than rigorously systematized; some practical details (e.g., exact configuration parameters) are not fully elaborated, but the overall reasoning is sound and grounded in real-world experience.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

Scientific rigor is moderate; the information is largely experiential, and while the speaker mentions security events and tools, he does not provide formal citations beyond a few GitHub links in the description. The sources listed are relevant and credible (pysap, sncscan, and the SAP_GW_RCE_exploit), and they align closely with the content discussed. The title is accurate, as the episode directly addresses ERP security with a focus on SAP. The absence of chapters makes navigation harder, but the discussion flows logically. No public comments were provided for analysis, so audience reception cannot be assessed.

218 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on ERP security with a deep dive into SAP.

Quality & Reliability

8/10

The discussion is led by a security expert with hands-on experience in SAP penetration testing, referencing real CVEs and providing detailed technical insight. The information is consistent with known SAP security challenges, though it relies primarily on personal experience rather than formal citations.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • OWASP/pysap — Library for interacting with SAP protocols, used in the episode for network-level attack automation.
  • usdAG/sncscan — Tool for scanning SAP RFC interfaces without authentication, mentioned as an open-source utility.
  • chipik/SAP_GW_RCE_exploit — Exploit for SAP Gateway remote code execution, based on pysap, illustrating practical exploitation.

Contribution & Novelties

This video offers a current, practitioner-level overview of SAP security, highlighting recent changes in attack dynamics and providing a structured methodology for auditing. It bridges the gap for pentesters familiar with Windows/AD by drawing parallels, and introduces both known and upcoming tools. The announcement of SAExec adds novel value.

Pour aller plus loin :

94 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows balanced scores across quantity, quality, technical depth, and reliability, with a slight bias toward practical applicability. This reflects a solid, expert-driven discussion that is rich in actionable insights but may not be as comprehensive or formally cited as a peer-reviewed source.

Reliability 8/10