Angry Review of Game of Thrones Season 7 EP2 (Stormborn) + Recap & Predictions

Angry Review of Game of Thrones Season 7 EP2 (Stormborn) + Recap & Predictions

🎙 Quinn's Ideas 👥 1.0M 📅 July 24, 2017 ⏱ 11 min 👁 81K 📄 expert opinion 🧭 2026-08-26
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

Game of ThronesSeason 7StormbornreviewASOIAF

Summary

In this video, Quinn’s Ideas delivers an angry review of Game of Thrones Season 7 Episode 2, ‘Stormborn’. He begins by criticizing the show’s decline since Season 4, then provides a scene-by-scene breakdown. He praises the Euron Greyjoy attack scene, particularly the deaths of the Sand Snakes, and the Arya/Nymeria reunion, which he finds emotionally resonant. He also discusses the Jorah greyscale cure subplot, the dragon-killing weapon reveal, and the political maneuvering at Dragonstone. He criticizes the Missandei/Grey Worm romance as pointless. He appreciates Varys’s speech about serving the realm. He predicts Cersei will make Ellaria Sand watch her daughter die. He gives the episode an 8.5/10, noting the dialogue is messy but the episode is an improvement over the premiere.

121 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video’s value lies in its passionate, opinionated critique, which resonates with fans who share similar frustrations with the show’s direction. The argumentation is based on the creator’s personal taste and his knowledge of the books, but it lacks a structured, evidence-based approach. He makes subjective claims (e.g., ’the show has been on a steady decline since season 4’) without providing concrete examples or analysis to support them. The strength of the argument is more emotional than logical, appealing to viewers who already agree with his perspective.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite any external sources; it is purely the creator’s opinion. The title accurately reflects the content, which is an angry review. The creator references the books (ASOIAF) to point out differences, but does not provide citations. The description includes links to his Fiverr, Patreon, and social media, but no scholarly or official sources. The title is appropriate and does not mislead.

167 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: an angry, critical review of the episode, including a recap and predictions.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The review is subjective and opinion-driven, with a clear personal bias against the show's recent seasons. The creator demonstrates knowledge of the source material (ASOIAF) and points out deviations, but the analysis is not systematic or evidence-based. The score reflects the balance between informed commentary and personal rant.

Key Moments

Cited Sources

  • Fiverr Gig: Record an epic narration — Service offering by the creator, not a source for the content.

Concurring Sources

  • Game of Thrones Season 7 Episode 2 Review — IGN's review of the episode, which also notes some pacing and dialogue issues.

Dissenting Sources

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a passionate fan perspective on the episode, highlighting specific scenes and making predictions. It does not provide new information or original analysis beyond personal opinion. The creator’s knowledge of the books adds depth to his critiques, but the video is primarily a rant.

Pour aller plus loin :

  • A Song of Ice and Fire — The book series by George R.R. Martin, providing the source material for the show.
  • Game of Thrones season 7 — Overview of the season, including episode summaries and production details.
  • The Forsaken (The Winds of Winter) — A chapter from the upcoming book, referenced in the video for the Euron scene.

109 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, with slightly higher quantity of information due to the detailed recap, but lower quality and technical level due to the subjective and non-technical nature. The overall reliability is moderate, reflecting the opinion-based content.

Reliability 5/10

💬 Positif. Sur les 30 commentaires analysés, la majorité exprime un soutien à la critique du créateur, appréciant son honnêteté et son analyse détaillée, bien que certains désapprouvent son ton agressif.