AFM Webinar by Mr. Amos Okech pt.2

AFM Webinar by Mr. Amos Okech pt.2

🎙 Amos Okech 👥 896 📅 August 26, 2026 ⏱ 86 min 👁 0 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-26
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

NPVIRRMIRRinvestment appraisaldiscount rate

Summary

This webinar, led by Mr. Amos Okech, focuses on advanced financial management (AFM) techniques, specifically investment appraisal. The session begins with a recap of Net Present Value (NPV), emphasizing the importance of correctly laying out operating and non-operating cash flows, determining the appropriate discount rate (cost of capital), and calculating NPV. The instructor then introduces the Internal Rate of Return (IRR), explaining it as the break-even discount rate that yields an NPV of zero. He illustrates the inverse relationship between discount rate and NPV, and demonstrates how IRR is used as a benchmark for investment decisions, comparing it to a pass mark in an exam. The webinar also covers the limitations of IRR, such as potential conflicts with NPV decisions, and introduces the Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR) as a solution. The session includes interactive Q&A, clarifying concepts like tax allowable depreciation and the separation of tax and depreciation calculations. The instructor emphasizes the importance of professional skills in AFM, including communication, analysis, skepticism, and commercial acumen. The webinar concludes with a summary of the AFM syllabus areas and the focus on advanced investment appraisal.

186 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The webinar provides a solid, practical explanation of investment appraisal techniques, particularly NPV and IRR. The instructor uses relatable analogies (e.g., pass mark) and interactive questioning to reinforce understanding. The argumentation is coherent, clearly explaining the logic behind each technique and its application. The introduction of MIRR as a solution to IRR’s limitations is well-justified. The value lies in its pedagogical approach, making complex concepts accessible to students. However, the content is largely a recap of standard principles, with limited depth on advanced applications or real-world complexities.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The webinar is scientifically rigorous in its adherence to standard financial management principles. However, no external sources are cited, and the content relies solely on the instructor’s expertise. The title accurately reflects the content, as it is the second part of an AFM webinar. The presentation is clear and structured, but the lack of citations and the informal, interactive format may reduce its perceived authority for some viewers. The instructor’s explanations are consistent with established financial theory, but the absence of references to academic literature or industry standards is a notable gap.

194 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content: a second part of an AFM webinar led by Mr. Amos Okech.

Quality & Reliability

7/10

The webinar is an educational tutorial by an experienced lecturer, providing clear explanations of investment appraisal techniques. The content is consistent with standard financial management principles, but no external sources are cited, and the presentation is informal with interactive Q&A.

Key Moments

Contribution & Novelties

The webinar provides a clear pedagogical explanation of investment appraisal techniques, particularly the practical application of IRR and MIRR. It emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between discount rates and NPV, and introduces MIRR as a solution to potential conflicts between NPV and IRR decisions. The interactive format and use of analogies enhance comprehension for students.

Pour aller plus loin :

95 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows balanced scores across information quantity, quality, technical level, and reliability, indicating a well-rounded educational content. The slightly lower technical level reflects the introductory nature of the webinar, while the reliability score is moderate due to the lack of cited sources.

Reliability 7/10