La meilleure manière de TRIER et de SAUVEGARDER ses FICHIERS

La meilleure manière de TRIER et de SAUVEGARDER ses FICHIERS

🎙 Eliott Meunier 👥 51K 📅 March 14, 2021 ⏱ 10 min 👁 8K 📄 tutorial 🧭 2026-08-27
Available in: English (current) Français

Keywords

file tribackupexternal hard driveTime Machinecloud storage

Summary

The video presents a personal system for organizing and backing up files. The creator proposes a two-folder structure: an ‘archive’ for completed projects and documents, sorted by year and project, and a ‘projects’ folder for ongoing work. The archive is stored on an external hard drive, while active projects remain on the computer’s internal storage (or a fast external SSD for video editors). For backup, the creator recommends a 3-2-1 strategy: three copies of data, on two different media, with one offsite. Specifically, he advises using one external drive for a full system backup (e.g., Time Machine on Mac), and two additional drives for the archive, with one kept offsite (e.g., at a friend’s house or in a fireproof safe). He also mentions cloud storage as an optional third copy, but warns about costs and security. Finally, he gives hardware recommendations, such as Samsung T5 SSDs for active work and budget-friendly Toshiba drives for backups, and suggests using a NAS for future scalability.

163 words

Critical Evaluation

Value of the Information & Strength of the Argument

The video offers practical, actionable advice based on the creator’s personal experience. The argumentation is logical and easy to follow, with clear steps and rationales for each recommendation. However, it lacks empirical evidence or references to industry standards, and some claims (e.g., about cloud security) are oversimplified. The value lies in its simplicity and applicability for general users, but it may not be comprehensive for advanced data management needs.

Scientific Rigor, Source Quality, Title Accuracy

The video does not cite any scientific sources or external references. The only links provided are to the creator’s own website and courses, which are promotional. The title accurately reflects the content, and the video is well-structured with clear chapters. The advice is based on personal experience rather than research, which limits its scientific rigor.

139 words

Title / Content Match

The title accurately reflects the content, which focuses on file organization and backup strategies.

Quality & Reliability

6/10

The video provides a practical, experience-based method for organizing and backing up files. It is coherent and actionable, but lacks scientific rigor and relies on personal anecdotes rather than empirical evidence or expert sources.

Chapters

Cited Sources

  • Eliott Meunier's blog — Mentioned in the video description as a resource for further information.
  • Atomic Thinking school — Mentioned in the video description as the creator's online school for productivity and knowledge management.
  • Atomic Knowledge course — Mentioned in the video description as a course for building a 'second brain'.
  • Atomic Creator course — Mentioned in the video description as a course for content creation.
  • Atomic Timing course — Mentioned in the video description as a course for productivity and time management.
  • Atomic Student course — Mentioned in the video description as a course for students.
  • Eliott Meunier's book — Mentioned in the video description as a book on note-taking.

Concurring Sources

  • 3-2-1 Backup Rule — The video's backup strategy aligns with the widely recommended 3-2-1 rule.

External References

Contribution & Novelties

The video offers a simple, systematic approach to file organization and backup, emphasizing the 3-2-1 rule and the importance of offsite backups. It provides practical tips for implementing this system, such as using two external drives for archives and a dedicated drive for system backups. The novelty lies in the clear separation of active projects and archives, and the emphasis on redundancy.

Pour aller plus loin :

109 words

Radar Profile

The radar profile shows moderate scores across all dimensions, with a slight emphasis on information quantity and quality. The video is informative and practical, but lacks technical depth and scientific rigor, resulting in a balanced but not exceptional profile.

Reliability 5/10

💬 No comments were provided for analysis.